According to new research from The University of Texas MD Anderson Proton Therapy Center.

‘It is suggested that trials of proton APBI are irrelevant because of the modality's presumed great price, but our data implies that this perception is false. Correcting this perpetual assumption can be an important part of helping patients obtain the necessary health coverage to participate in clinical study,’ said Valentina Ovalle, M.D., postdoctoral study fellow and principal investigator. ‘Further, we anticipate that because fees differ proportionately across payers, the approximated Medicare reimbursement costs likely reflect relative fees to various other third-party payers.’ The American Cancer Society estimates that 232,670 individuals will be identified as having invasive breast cancer this full year.Therefore it remained unclear if the differences recorded between your two study hands were really obvious for the sufferers. Related StoriesCornell biomedical engineers develop 'super natural killer cells' to destroy cancer cells in lymph nodesMeat-rich diet may boost kidney cancer riskNew findings reveal association between colorectal cancer and melanoma drug treatment Results on ‘side effects’ are uncertain Many data on ‘side effects’ presented by the pharmaceutical business were also not analysed appropriately, and could not be utilized therefore. This was true for the entire rate of adverse events and for serious adverse events, as well as for the precise adverse events ‘fractures’ and ‘liquid retention/oedema’.